TW200 Forum banner
  • Hey Everyone! Vote for the Site Favourite BOTM winner for the year of 2022 HERE!
1 - 20 of 31 Posts

· Registered
Joined
·
1,498 Posts
Discussion Starter · #1 ·
I've been pondering the idea of putting on a led auxiliary light on the 98 tw. Anyone on here used the advmonster.com LEDs or have an led headllight? Been thinking about one model 30 which is a 1500 lumen 10 watt or one of the 44's which is 2000 lumen at 24 watts I believe. I have a single led 200 lumen headlamp that I use for caving/hunting and it's amazing how much of a difference it makes at night. If I don't do the led auxiliary light or led headlight I'm might just try out the silverstar and see if the harness doesn't melt. I did do the switch mod so I can turn of the light if not needed.. Oh another question. If you run the switch in the middle with the stock bulb I'm guessing it's putting out 70watts? I have done this at nights few times on the tw and alot on the sv with no dead batty or melting. Input and ideas are welcome.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
7,044 Posts
You are playing with fire. Hope you don't get burnt. Best bet for a better headlight is wire the system so the headlight has a battery to maintain voltage at low engine speed and convert to a 35 watt bi-zenon HID. About the same draw as stock, with 6 times the light.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
255 Posts
I've been pondering the idea of putting on a led auxiliary light on the 98 tw. Anyone on here used the advmonster.com LEDs or have an led headllight? Been thinking about one model 30 which is a 1500 lumen 10 watt or one of the 44's which is 2000 lumen at 24 watts I believe. I have a single led 200 lumen headlamp that I use for caving/hunting and it's amazing how much of a difference it makes at night. If I don't do the led auxiliary light or led headlight I'm might just try out the silverstar and see if the harness doesn't melt. I did do the switch mod so I can turn of the light if not needed.. Oh another question. If you run the switch in the middle with the stock bulb I'm guessing it's putting out 70watts? I have done this at nights few times on the tw and alot on the sv with no dead batty or melting. Input and ideas are welcome.
I've been using the Silverstar Ultra for a few weeks now, not had any wiring issues that I know of and gives off noticably more light. The literature says H4 compatible or words to that effect and is the same 60/55 watt rating as the OEM bulb. I can't see there being any problems with wiring if the wattage remains the same. My concern with the Ultra was they may not last long due to the vibrations and bumpy roads. So far so good but they're not cheap, 69.00 dollars for two at Canadian Tire. Good luck.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
7,044 Posts
My first Silverstar Ultra lasted about 1500 miles. Great output, but sheesh on bulb life. I have another to try, and if it goes quickly, I'll be pissed. My next headlight will be http://www.truck-lite.com/webapp/wc...10001&storeId=10001&productId=64057&langId=-1 55 watts on high beam, 30 watts on low beam, so I'll add a couple 10-watt or 12-watt LED driving lights to balance the circuit. Darn thing runs about $250 for one, but it should be as close to bullet proof as a headlight can be.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
255 Posts
My first Silverstar Ultra lasted about 1500 miles. Great output, but sheesh on bulb life. I have another to try, and if it goes quickly, I'll be pissed. My next headlight will be http://www.truck-lit...64057&langId=-1 55 watts on high beam, 30 watts on low beam, so I'll add a couple 10-watt or 12-watt LED driving lights to balance the circuit. Darn thing runs about $250 for one, but it should be as close to bullet proof as a headlight can be.
Geez, that's not what I wanted to hear . The box said something about a warranty for a year and I may have to see if they will honor it. Still have the original and will start carrying it with me in case. Won't be able to sneak $250 for a headlight past War and Finance.Thanks for the info.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
1,498 Posts
Discussion Starter · #7 ·
I'm thinking I will try the auxiliary led light and only use it at night. I I'm pretty sure the 10watt .85amp one would ok if I'm not at an idle and maybe the 24watt. I'd rather spend 60 bucks trying that than $25+ plus that will only last a short while. That's less watts then both beams on with the stock bulb. If the ol tw doesn't like it then im sure the sv will.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3 Posts
The fuse for the headlight is bigger than the use for several other systems implying it uses more power. I'd like to do 2 things. Build an LED headlight myself. (Who cares if its 100% legal or not) Also add a switch to disable it during the day. I want tail lights during the day, but the head light seems useless. Although I haven't been on one yet, maybe it does really help make you more visible.



If 4000watt hours - 40 miles then 100 watt hours = 1 mile. At 50 watts, in an hour you could gain an extra half mile. Doesn't seem like much, but its 1025% increase in range. When you drive 50,000 miles you didn't pay for over 500 miles. It all adds up.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
7,044 Posts
If 4000watt hours - 40 miles then 100 watt hours = 1 mile. At 50 watts, in an hour you could gain an extra half mile. Doesn't seem like much, but its 1025% increase in range. When you drive 50,000 miles you didn't pay for over 500 miles. It all adds up.
Flunked math, didn't ya.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
7,044 Posts
Upgrading illumination or running with lights off can be done, but to do so with safeguards against component failure and setting your bike on fire are necessary if drastic changes are made in electrical demand.



Early TWs power the headlight directly off the alternator with AC voltage and no regulation. It is critical to keep about the same running draw as the stock headlight to prevent damaging the charging circuit. If additional tail/clearance lights are desired, switch to LEDs in the stock fixtures to free up wattage for the additional lights. LED conversion of the stock incandescents will free up enough wattage one could add a 10-12 watt LED auxilary headlight to the taillight circuit without problems, and still maintain approximate energy balance. The regulated DC current in the taillight circuit would suit the LED auxilary light to a T, and the light would not need a separate switch as it would be switched same as the taillight. This would be the easiest and simplest way to add a LED auxilary headlight to any TW.



'01 and newer TWs isolate all lighting from the alternator via a rectifier and battery. Therefore, the entire lighting system should be balanced as a whole. This is advantageous because significant wattage can be added to the headlight by replacing the stock incandescent turn/tail/indicator lamps with LEDs while still keeping the system balanced. It is not necessary to provide rectification of AC to DC or attentuation of pulsed DC to run different headlight technologies because Yamaha has already taken care of that.



What it all boils down to is '01 and newer TWs can be easily modded to provide almost double the wattage available for headlights as early models. This is a significant advantage for those of us who ride at night. Newer TWs can enjoy 8-12 times the illumination of the stock early TW headlight when current technology lighting products are used. Those serious about improved lighting with early TWs that develop electrical problems would do well to shop for a complete '01+ electrcial system to retrofit.



Doesn't the '98 use a 35 watt headlight bulb? If so, just dropping in a 55 watt replacement might not be such a good idea. TWs have a balanced electrical system, with alternator ouput about equal to system demand. Mods that move this balance way out of whack can affect electrical components in a bad way. Therefore, replacement lights should leave each circuit with the same total watt draw. 20-25 extra watts of light could overheat your headlight coil. Be careful to keep the system balanced and you can run anything you want. Today there are many lighting options that provide improved intensity and put more light in a useful pattern that draw, singly or in combination, 35 watts or somewhere thereabouts.



For instance, HID coversions are available that draw ~35 watts, and provide 4-6 times the output intensity of a 35 watt incandescent. Unfortunately, early TWs run the headlight on AC current directly off the alternator, and the voltage drops at low rpm. HIDs require DC current, and though they draw low amps, they will not stay lit at low voltage. HIDs are not particularly fond of pulsed DC current at low hertz, so a battery is necessary to attentuate the pulses into a smoother constant DC supply. To run an HID on such a bike it is necessary to use a regulator to convert AC to DC, and a battery to provide sufficient voltage at low engine speed to keep the light on. If the electrical system is modified to meet the needs of the HID system, excellent performance is available.



Current technology LEDs provide about the same intensity of light as HIDs at the same current draw. LEDs generally only light when the current flows one direction, so half the alternator's output is wasted if wired in as a direct replacement for the stock headlight, if the LED lamp is designed to tolerate AC current. If not, it will fry. A rectifier provides pulsed DC output that suits LEDs, no battery required. LEDs will flicker with a pulsed DC current, but at higher rpm you'r eyes will not see the flicker. While not really necessary, a battery will keep LEDs constantly on, rather than flickering, resulting in a more intense output at all engine speeds.



If you want to run in stealth mode, lights off, best to add a regulator to the electrical system that shunts excess alternator output to some sort of heat dissipating balance resistor to deal with the alternator output not being used rather than trying to force it into a charged battery.



The above should provide some ponderable principles of adequately engineering lighting modifications. I leave the development of specific circuit schematics, analysis of replacement and additional lamps, and actual determination of components necessary to safely mod TW lighting systems to the individuals doing the work. Proceed at your own risk



If you saw the schematic planned for Tdub's electrics when she finally dies of old age, you'd freak. LEDs in every fixture, auxilary tail/brake/turns and headlights and navigation system can be shut off to provide wattage for an air compressor, heated grips, handheld spotlight, heated clothing, etc. The entire system is designed to swap one load for another as needed, and the battery is always protected from excessive discharge and charge rates. Even late TWs don't generate enough watts to run everything at once, but they do generate enough power to run everything if thought is put into using what's available to maximum advantage.



I suggest a spreadsheet of stock current draws on each circuit. Make changes as necessary to draw less using more efficient modern lamps, then add accessories to replace the demand at about the same rate the low wattage replacement parts lowered demand. I also suggest not trying to buy the cheap/low power LED replacements as their intensity is insufficient. On a motorcycle, stop/tail/turns cannot be too bright. What is your life worth?
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,923 Posts
Little clarity:



There are 3 possible systems on TW's. However only ONE year (1987) has the seperate lighting coil. Qwerty is correct that if you even THINK of installing a bigger headlight on this arrangement it will fry. But this does NOT apply to '88-2000 bikes.



The factory manual is misleading, and freely transposes info from the '87-only bikes with that of the 88-00 bikes, and vice-versa.



'88-2000 Tw's differ from '01-to-present only in alternator output. They have fully rectified and regulated lighting systems, (not seperate lighting coils), but have less output than '01-up units. They have a single-phase charging system and a 10 amp main fuse. The reason they have a 10 amp fuse is twofold. No individual wire can withstand more than 10 amps, nor can the total load of the entire system. You can reduce loads to accomodate increases in other loads just like the later system, but only if the total output of the system is considered in the equation, not to excede 10 amps, minus a buffer.



'01-up units have a three-phase alternator, higher output and a 20 amp main fuse. A more powerful system overall, particularly at low rpm, with one caveat: They have the same wire sizes as any other TW, yet the system is fused to match the total load. No individual wire can handle any more current than an early model, so be careful when dogpiling onto the headlight or any other circuit with additional loads. Use a relay and increase the wire sizes according to the load.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
7,044 Posts
Hmmm? I worked on a TW that was supposed to be a '93, but it's headlight was wired like a '87. However, it was originally sold in the South American market, so take that with a grain of salt. There did not appear to be any modifications to the system. Considering the number of markets in which the TW has been sold, maybe it's best to devise a test to determine if a particular bike has an AC or DC headlight circuit. Pretty simple, actually. If the headlight switch is not in an "off" position (American market bikes do not have an "off" position), the key is in the "on" position, and the geadlight lights, the bike has a DC headlight. If the headlight is off, but comes on when the engine is started, the bike has an AC headlight.



In either case, lizrdbrth is correct about limits on wiring. However, if LEDs are used to replace tail, indicator, and marker lamps, there will be sufficient wattage reduction to allow a 10-12 watt LED auxilary headlight to be added to the circuit without creating problems. Swapping the LEDs will reduce circuit demand by 10-12 watts, the auxilary headlight will increase circuit demand by 10-12 watts, and the net change in current draw will be close to zero. Quick, easy, cheap, and safe. That's the way I like it.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,923 Posts
I feel ya. With Yamaha there are no absolutes. Between the various markets and those which included the TW125 there could be some overlap.



It's also possible that some very early 88's shipped to the U.S. market may have been equipped as '87's as well, but in general nothing after '87 in the U.S. should have the old system.
 

· Banned
Joined
·
7,044 Posts
It's not just Yamaha. You never know what parts a previous owner swapped in. I've tuned a '98 with the late model automatic cam chain tensioner.
 

· Registered
Joined
·
3,923 Posts
I'd hate to be the poor slob who ends up with mine after I hit room temp. I combined the best of the old and new TW's along with so many non-Yamaha parts and better parts from other bikes that he'll spend the rest of his life arguing with counter guys if it ever needs anything.



As to the Silverstars and their ilk on '88-2000 bikes: I bought a bike awhile back. The owner didn't ride it often, and when he did it was only on local errands. He bragged that it had a Silverstar on its list of add-ons, then said it ate batteries and sometimes wouldn't start on the button the day after using it. I bought it for a song because he was tired of dealing with it, and according to him it needed a new battery. Again.



I brought it home, pulled the Silverstar and replaced it with a 35/35. Kicked it over on the existing battery and it's been running like a champ ever since.



Why? Because at nearly double the amp draw the Silverstar was preventing the charging system from keeping the battery topped off in the course of his low speed errands.



YMMV, but I doubt it.
 
1 - 20 of 31 Posts
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Top