TW200 Forum banner
  • Hey Everyone! Vote for the Site Favourite BOTM winner for the year of 2022 HERE!

What's your actual top speed and on what spocket setup?... 13T front?... and can anyone please confirm that spocket compatibility.

1242 Views 46 Replies 14 Participants Last post by  m003
So, my TW came with a 14T/52T... doing city so top speed is lacking, comfortably doing 70(kph)(mph would be 43.5) and topping at 95(59mph)... not enough for highway and if you ask me the lower gear fast switching is a bit much, torque is great though... thats 4% lower than 14/50T OEM.

Brown Font Rectangle Screenshot Number


So i got a rear 45T on aliex, the only one available in my area... theoretically the new top speed would be 110, but its barely touching 102 where the engine cant take it anymore and dont reach full RPM... if im correct the max RPM is supposed to be 9500, and max power at 8000RPM which it doesnt reach on 14/45T... for reference im 69kg soaking wet (porn pun intended ;-)

so it seems that a lower gearing in reality equals less speed, and anyway the torque is now lacking... optimally im guessing to reach max speed the gearing should match the max speed it can give at 8000RPM or slightly above.

That new ratio is +15.6% of what i had, so the answer would be in between.

What's your actual concrete top speed and on what gearing?

for now, being a problem to get another rear sprocket, i can either go 13/45T or 15/52T which is pretty much the same ratio.

Is there any reason why a 13T in front would be problem?,... thats easier to go with that, not needing a new chain, but i dont think ive ever heard of anybody with a 13T.

And can anybody confirm if that sprocket will fit the Tdub dimension-wise?... (20mm center hole widest part and 34mm between side holes)... photoshop says most likely, but....

Organism Font Screenshot Technology Terrestrial plant

Bicycle part Font Circle Bicycle drivetrain part Gear

Gear Bicycle part Bicycle Rim Auto part

Bicycle part Rim Circle Pattern Auto part

Purple Sleeve Pink Violet Finger


Sports equipment Automotive tire Pink Red Font


Font Circle Art Tints and shades Personal protective equipment

Font Art Magenta Tints and shades Pattern

Tire Wheel Automotive tire Motor vehicle Vehicle


_
See less See more
10
1 - 20 of 47 Posts
Stock gearing. 70 mph riding 2 up. Never tried solo. 70 was fairly easy. Held it for several miles. Not my favorite thing to do but it is there if needed.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Stock gearing. 70 mph riding 2 up. Never tried solo. 70 was fairly easy. Held it for several miles. Not my favorite thing to do but it is there if needed.
Yours must be more recent, ive got a 1999 and i doubt it will ever reach 70kph.

maybe my speedmeter is off too, cause its working super well and im pretty sure im reaching that 9500rpm soundwise, and on stock gearing that meter would show 61.36mph.

...weird
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Running stock and at 55 mph it sounds like the engine is going to fly apart. Thinking about gearing it up like a TT race bike where you need to run along the side of the bike for the first 200 ft from the starting line just to get it moving. But then it will do 150 no sweat. Red lights, stop signs and crosswalks are really going to suck tho.

  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 4
Running stock and at 55 mph it sounds like the engine is going to fly apart. Thinking about gearing it up like a TT race bike where you need to run along the side of the bike for the first 200 ft from the starting line just to get it moving. But then it will do 150 no sweat. Red lights, stop signs and crosswalks are really going to suck tho.
you wont be able to do that, thats what my post explains, your problem wont be the bike it will be air resistance.... even with a 42T it looks from other posts that you need a steep downhill to get any meaningful increase.

bottom line is that its a 200cc, and air resistance increase exponentially, the faster you go the more power you need to increase a given amount, this leads to a theoretical speed limit... thats why a bugatti cheron for example can only reach 350kph or wathever it does, if air wasnt there it might be 2000kph.

on that video you sent, those are 600-1000cc+... thats 3-5 Tdub's... that kawasaki H2R in your video delivers 310hp of power, your Tdub only 16hp, yet with 20x the power it cant even do 3x the speed of a stock Tdub, thats what air resistance does... if your aim was to achieve those speed you really didnt get the right bike... lol ;-)

and yes im under stock a bit and it sounds like its gonna fly apart... hahaahaa.. it wont though.

_
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 5
Max observed indicated speed was 73mph at ~7,500 ft running 13 x 55 sprockets spinning a 26" ATV tire and a Wiseco 67.50mm piston, 87 octane pump gas .
Granted it was downhill with a rain squall right behind me pushing me with a strong tailwind. Without adequate rain gear and a good 40 miles from camp I was motivated to stay ahead of the rain.. Engine was wound out but seemed healthy enough, decelerated to mid-60s after a mile or so as road got twisty and caution entered my brain.
Your results will likely vary.
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Hi,
before I've changed to a 520 chain, I've used on my motocross/enduro TW a 13 front sprocked.
For my 125 cc engine was it a huge difference to change from 14/50 to 13/54.
But I had to remove a little bit material from the lock plate, because the chain links had contact to the lock plate.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Max observed indicated speed was 73mph at ~7,500 ft running 13 x 55 sprockets..
im pretty sure you made a mistake on your stated gearing... with 13T/55T you should not reach over 60mph... thats a 15% higher gearing that stock.

Font Screenshot Plant Number Electric blue


Did you change your front wheel size?... if so, your speedmeter isnt accurate anymore btw.

67.5mm piston changes absolutely nothing, maybe 3-4cc more, stock is 67mm.

87octane neither, theres zero difference from 87 to 95 in a TW since its a low compression engine, that octane level has nothing to do with power its simply a measerment of how much compression the gaz can support before it explodes, its only meant to prevent engine clacking on high compression engines.


_
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 2
No mistake, I have run 13 x 55 sprockets exclusively for over a decade on both of my TWs, both have exceeded 60 mph with the slower one confirmed by real time GPS. Was just supplying factual evidence in case it might be helpful without trying to imply anything in regards to the bike's set up.
My real world experience means more to me than anything a chart may claim.
Thread title asked about top speed on what sprockets and I responded honestly.
Almost sorry now that I tried to be helpful with a response about my real world experience.
  • Like
Reactions: 3
Now if my comment about "indicated' vs "actual" discredits my post #7 then OK, no worries.
However GPS readings over 60mph on my other "stock" TW 200 running 13 x 55 sprockets at 5,000 ft elevation remains a real world experience.
  • Like
Reactions: 2
No mistake, I have run 13 x 55 sprockets exclusively for over a decade on both of my TWs, both have exceeded 60 mph with the slower one confirmed by real time GPS...
No, im not saying you're lying or anything negative, im stating that maths doesnt had up somewhere, and this might be a mistake on my side...

by "real world experience" it was assumed a lower performance that theoretically possible, not higher...

i mean want it or not its math... you got a RPM, then a primary ratio, then a secondary ratio (said gearing), and then a wheel size, and thats it... anything other than that doesnt matter on the top speed, even if the engine was 500cc.

I just dont get how you're getting 77mph with this ratio, again im not saying you're lying, im sure you're not, im just trying to understand how that would be.

thats just not an engine doing 12000rpm, i dont think you can change the primary gearing, and theres maybe the wheel size i didnt get... piston been lighter ok maybe, but if you didnt change the CDI... ?

you have a 199.32cc.. stock is 196cc... thats something, but borderline irrelevant considering a 18mph increase.

Font Screenshot Parallel Darkness Brand


87oct or else is completely irrelevant.

did you change your internal gearing, and whats your rear wheel size more precisely?

other than that and your weight, theres pretty much nothing else... elevation is mostly an engine thing, not really an air resistance one, and this means lees oxygen, so there as well performance should decrease slightly.

real world is fine, there's just no way it can break physics obviously... ;-)

im glad to know that a 13T fits though, thanks for that... i just dont know if it will fit as well with a rear 45T.

sorry if i came as harsh, that wasnt my intention.

_
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 2
FYI
If bike one is 13/55 and bike two is 13/55, you can have different speeds.
This is caused by a different rear tyre, the rolling circumference is the important fact.
180/80-14 - 202 cm - 79.6" (calculated, not measured)
26" (ATV) - 207 cm - 81.6" (calculated, not measured)
Important:
There is a difference between a 26x8x14 and a 26x9x14.
I've tested it with the Maxxis Bighorn. The 9" is bigger as a 8".
For this reason a TW with a 9" will be faster as a 8" with the same gearing and rpm.
  • Like
Reactions: 1
FYI
If bike one is 13/55 and bike two is 13/55, you can have different speeds.
This is caused by a different rear tyre, the rolling circumference is the important fact....
I know this, thats why i asked more info on the rear wheel size... seems like the most probable culprit.

thats a ratio thing... you could have a 9T/77T, if your rear wheel is big enough thats the same ratio in the end.

the only ratio that matters in the end is when the engine does 1 turn, how many turns the wheel does and whats it's size?... or you could say, how many feet on the ground does the circumference move with 1 turn of the engine.

_
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Is there any reason why a 13T in front would be problem?,... thats easier to go with that, not needing a new chain, but i dont think ive ever heard of anybody with a 13T.
What's your actual concrete top speed and on what gearing?
No, no reason at all. I have been running a 13/50 setup since 2010 on three TW's. About 23,000 miles in all. I replaced the 13 and chain at about 11,000 miles on the first bike.

I can get up to about 62mph (GPS speed, about 4 mph under the speedo) with a little downhill or tailwind on the 13/50 and about 58 with the 13/55 (dual sprocket). I won't run the bike for more than a few miles at either of those speeds because of the appalling sound and handlebar buzz....55 and 50 are more like the everyday top end (GPS speed) with those sprockets. Going back to stock 14/50 gearing would probably get you a solid 60 mph (GPS speed) with an absolute top of around 70 in flat country with no wind. There is only so much you can do with only 13.7 horsepower!
  • Like
Reactions: 1
To clarify I said an indicated not actual 73, and not 77mph. Think we all know of the inherent inaccuracies of our speedos.
Perhaps a few of us can glance at a navigation screen's GPS speed readout at those speeds to glean actual speed. I'm happy to just glance at the dancing needle when one's focus really needs to be heads up and out of the cockpit. Under those circumstances I was more focused on cleaving a good line for 2 leaving room for forum member Plumbstraight who was right on my heels. He just had on his cotton logger's Hickory shirt with the torn off sleeves over cotton jeans so was even less interested in a rainy ride than I was. He was also busting an indicated 70 mph on his stock engine & geared TW. Who knows what our "actual speeds" were. Once again speeds were observed on a reasonable downgrade with a rain laden tailwind as mitigating and motivating factors. Upon reflection was running a 26" nominal height IRC TerraCross 14 x 8 on factory wire rim at 10 psi. Who knows actual diameter at speed.
Tire Wheel Automotive tire Tread Synthetic rubber


Tire diameters change with speed, temperature and tire construction thus changing final drive ratios that simple linear math does not account for...just ask any drag racer and what the non-linear changing diameter of drag slicks can do for gear ratios as speed increases.
I certainly do not argue the basics of gear ratios but years of various testing often revealing deviations from results predicted by accepted theories makes me try to avoid drawing exact conclusions about what is, or is not possible or probable. Usually there are other variables at play not accounted for when something does not adhere to the statistical norm. Still we like to speak in generalities, the central tendencies, the 95th percentile , or N95 as was made so popular during COVID ( filter material targets retention of 95% of particulates larger than 5 microns, says nothing about leakage around mask. Never mind the virus is about 0.1 microns in diameter, 1/50th of the mask's target particle size).

Sorry for rant but spent time qualitatively measuring respirator filtering for OSHA compliance. Have to know your stuff to confidently tell a burly drill rig roustabout that not only does he have to wear a respirator but he has to shave his beard baby smooth or don't come to work. N95 masks and most respirators are fairly ineffective, better is anything positive pressure like a PARP or Racal air hood.
See less See more
  • Like
Reactions: 4
TW front sprockets are available from 11 to 16 tooth and I have seen all sizes be run at various time in the past few decades

for my riding I wish all TW's came with 15 tooth fronts so the first gear is actually a good usable gear and not just a granny low used to launch
  • Like
Reactions: 1
TW front sprockets are available from 11 to 16 tooth and I have seen all sizes be run at various time in the past few decades

for my riding I wish all TW's came with 15 tooth fronts so the first gear is actually a good usable gear and not just a granny low used to launch
good to know that it can take 11T, then 13T shouldnt be a problem with any rear sprocket.

15T front doesnt matter at all on the first gear though... only the ratio between the front and rear does... you could have an 11T in front and the first gear would feel exactly the same as a 15T, as long as the rear one follow that ratio.

ie: 10/30T... 11/33T... 12/36T... 13/39T... 14/42T... 15/45T... 16/48T... those are the exact same gearing, all a 3:1 ratio, 3 turns of the shaft translate to 1 turn of the wheel, and all are identical on how the bike react.

Not all rear gear size exist i believe though, ... ive seen 42/45/47/50/52/55 so far, but... to get a precise ratio you might need to play with the front and rear ... the stock 14T seems to me like a good choice by yamaha though.

EDIT: if you meant "came with 15T stock"... yeah ok, i would agree with you partially, but that would imply some road cause otherwise thats meant to be a trail bike... (15/50T i dont believe this to be a ratio that will alloow full HP use on the 5th gear)... and i would still keep the 14T, but drop the rear to 47T... same ratio, the rear been smaller though theres just less chances to hit rocks and such... if thats really more trail oriented then dropping the front seems like a better idea to me, to keep the rear as small as possible too.


_
See less See more
TW sprockets on the small end of the spectrum can cause sawing and damage to the top of swingarm. The 13 tooth up front needs a 50 tooth at least to lift the chain off the swing arm's chain slider during most of the suspension's admittedly limited 6 inch ravel.

As far as what constitutes the ideal gearing for first ( and all gears for that matter) is a function of one's riding terrain and riding style. For example I spent significant time in first gear today happily with 13 x 55 sprockets basically "jeeping" through mud, flowing water, bashing through snow banks & negotiating good sized rocks that would be more difficult with a 14 or 15 tooth front sprocket. While this is good for me I would never tell someone that they need to do what I do.
I applaud others stating what works best for them but don't let them tell you what is best for YOU. Their extreme challenging trail may be everyday milk toast for you, or vis versa. Not everything is smooth or flat, some of us have to share steep rocky roadbeds with the occasional whitewater rapids, best comfortably done at a moderately slow pace so as to react to submerged surprises. :) This was typical conditions today.
Mirror Plant Tree Automotive mirror Motor vehicle
See less See more
  • Like
  • Helpful
Reactions: 5
TW sprockets on the small end of the spectrum can cause sawing and damage to the top of swingarm. The 13 tooth up front needs a 50 tooth at least to lift the chain off the swing arm's chain slider during most of the suspension's admittedly limited 6 inch travel...
thats all good on your trail situation (looks fun btw ;-), but since im doing 99.5% flat city road, do you believe i would be fine with a 13/45T.. ???

...or maybe a strapped rubber tube layer to protect that swingarm area...?

i see that 14/42T is quite common, so 13/45T doesnt seems much of a stretch...

thats my 14/45T situation if thats any help... i cant say i do see much, but...



Automotive tire Crankset Automotive lighting Motor vehicle Bicycle tire
Automotive tire Automotive lighting Alloy wheel Tire Vehicle
Automotive tire Motor vehicle Wood Vehicle brake Rim
Tire Wheel Automotive tire Motor vehicle Tread
Tire Automotive tire Automotive lighting Hood Motor vehicle
Wheel Tire Automotive tire Locking hubs Tread
Tire Automotive lighting Automotive tire Hood Bicycle tire
Crankset Bicycle tire Bicycle Bicycle frame Bicycle fork
Tire Wheel Automotive tire Bicycle tire Tread
Tire Wheel Automotive tire Motor vehicle Alloy wheel


_
See less See more
10
1 - 20 of 47 Posts
Top